Advertisement

Author Topic: Australian Army Missions  (Read 2271 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zell

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #15 on: 21 Apr 2003, 05:45:26 »
u say brits are better than aussies have aussies had a casualty in the war yet?????????? (Rhetoricle Question).

Phantom

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #16 on: 21 Apr 2003, 15:53:08 »
who says brits are better?

Frosty

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #17 on: 29 Apr 2003, 12:23:40 »
Which war (better not be WWI, cos that would be harsh considering ANZAC day has just past)? gulf war take 2, scene 1? Well, theres that camera man. Plus we only sent over 2000, so that lessens the chance. And they were all elte SAS (although all our soldiers are elite).

Phantom

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #18 on: 29 Apr 2003, 12:29:44 »
lol, the SAS were the smallest part, what you wrote says that there were 2000 SAS over there, which is hard when the force is only 250 strong.

Yes, no-one died. And on another note, 10 SAS soldiers have died in combat since the group were started in the 50's.

The majority of the 2000 strong contribution were logistics, intel & comms, SAS, pilot's, RAN commitments (Ship support, Clearance Diver Teams) and the people that keep the pilot's in the air.

and i don't think it really makes if difference when you bring up australian war commitments, we all know it happened, if you were having a shot at them, it'd be a whole other thing.

titan

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #19 on: 29 Apr 2003, 18:57:09 »
question....if u werent a Aussie, wld u still think them to be the best, now be honest here!

Offline Black_Feather

  • Former Staff
  • ****
  • I'll never forget you Daisey.
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #20 on: 29 Apr 2003, 22:53:49 »
your drifting off topic  ;)

Phantom

  • Guest
Re:Australian Army Missions
« Reply #21 on: 30 Apr 2003, 00:29:49 »
yes, now let's stay on topic so it ain't locked!