Hey!
Why should OFPEC give people a ridiculous amount of time to fix their mission anyway? These faulty missions were submitted August 28th (thats 7 months ago) and December 12th (3 months and 16 days ago). Do these people look like they give a damn
?
If it were me, i'd give authors an e-mail, instant message and 3 months to fix and resubmit their missions. Why should OFPEC bend-over-backwards supplying their time, money and effort into waiting for people ignorant enough to not even send an e-mail saying: "am sori bud but a cant b assed wiv dat mission. jus delet it or woteva!" After all, its
your site and
your money going into this website. Not his/hers and I can guaruntee that these people couldn't give a flying monkey if it was the year 2514 and their mission was still faulty and pending.
Theres also a BETA testing board. One simple rule: Make sure your mission works before submitting and if your not sure, use the BETA board! Don't you find it a little annoying when OFPEC does its upmost to avoid these infestations of faulty missions but these jackass' decide otherwise!
Sometimes there are authors who do genuinly forget to BETA test it. But isn't an e-mail, IM and 3 months enough for the author to sit down and finalize it!
Even if there are good missions out there that are faulty, if they don't work they are
no better than bad ones. If someone did review them, the good mission and the bad one would both recieve 0/10. Am I right?
In conclusion, you can make a little formula for these faulty missions:-
faulty mission + admin ---> e-mail + IM + time limit ---> working mission/lazy guy who doesn't fix it. If the guy is away on business/at school, the e-mail wont delete itself. And if after the given time limit the mission is deleted it's always on his hard-drive. If he's deleted it, i've got one saying for you: "lifes a b***h!"
Scooter24 :afro:
@macguba:-
Don't you think it's a little unfair on the guy who submitted his work 7 months ago and it's still not been reviewed?