but... this doesnt mean you're gonna choose over 18's over those under? its a 15+ game, so sureley 15+ should have equal chance?
Hold your horses, Messiah, and ake a look at our practice. We
have under 18 staff (except in the forums), including (and especially) some of the most recently recruited. Nobody can say there would be no chances for people under 18. Our recruiting decisions are based on our experience and common sense. And age is one of the less important things we look at.
Nothing has to be added to Noons point. In the time we're running the site we have made pretty much every experience with recruiting staff you can imagine (good ones and bad ones). When I say "It's helpful, but not required, to be 18 or older", this statement is simply based on our experience. But you shouldn't over-interpret it or let it disencourage you. If you feel you can contribute to the site, we'll take a fair look at your application and when we feel you're suited, you're more than welcome.