Hi
I was delighted to see there is a PDF version of the COMREF.
I noticed you put the images of the objects into the end of the document. It was disappointing to notice that there was no classnames with the images. As such, the object image list is, in my humble opinion, highly unusable. What a scripter needs to know is not only how the object looks like, but essentially, what is its classname. Now the image list in the PDF is there to make the PDF significantly larger but doesn't add much value.
Other info like the .pd3 filename and location would not be a bad addition either. Maybe planck has this info in one of his references?
I have to even question the need of putting the object image list to the comref in the first place. Wouldn't it be better to have such info in a separate document? Now the pdf comref is unnecessarily heavy for no clear benefit, even if you put the classnames into it I think it still would make more sense to have the images in a separate document.
Anyways, I gotta say this kind of documents are what OFPEC should be producing. Higher quality documents optimized for printing is what OFPEC could offer to this community.
Regards,
Baddo.