Now that I read this thread, and found that you need to be over the ages of 18 is truly something that should not be at a place like this...
I am 16 years old, and I have done many more important things that just "review missions" I am a Headline news poster at the "dead" but still existing OFP Arena. I did very important videogame reviews at Action-Arenathat earned me that gold status.
Not to mention a great deal of the OFP Community is UNDER the age of 18, and some very good scripts and missions ETC were made by these youngsters. This almost seems like a porno video subscription where you need to be 18 or older to call. That does'nt seem to fit correctly with a large OFP database area like this, where it's stage is higher than any other OFP Web Site to date for the past years.
I was infact hoping to join the Mission Review team, but sadly this "rule" is holding me back from this. While I understand that ofpec wishes to "maintain" it's mature looks and honorable status, I at least think you should give the youngsters a chance. After all they have a more broad imagination than those of older people.
I request this "18 or older" rule be discussed with the OFPEC Web Site team. Ages under 18 years, should definately be "tested" at least to decide if they have good typing skill and quality with missions.
Like me, I understand the basic rundown of reviewing items...
-Quality of the mission
-Is this worth the download
-type of person who will like this mission/who will not
-Ingenuity from the rest of the missions located out and about
and of course my favorite part, the total score...
I have been doing reviews for many years now, and I am only 16 and think you should change this 18 or older thing.
I am almost positive you can find a 15-16-17 year old who can do a job better than you anticipated...
Spec Op 9