Yeah, maybe we should also start a petition to deny
Brazil's Soccer World Cups from old times, as 'Pele'
seems not to be able anymore to challenge with the
rest of FIFA. ;D
And then also we should take off america from the americans, as rumors told, that 'Christoph Columbus' was absent lately.
Nah, ratings given for a mission are also related to their
time of release and their actual originality.
You can always have a look at the release/preview date of
a mission, and from those missions who even keep their quality
forever, you should hear/read every now and then around on
some forums.
Also the rating of a reviewed mission is rather mirroring more
an individual impression from the reviewer than from the whole
comunity. This would leed to the next term that missions should
be reviewed by almost everybody, to aproove it's ratings validity...............what a waste of time and resources, when there are such a lot of missions.........and for whom? some stragglers who were not on right place in right time ;D
No offence to anybody who came in later, but something like
this would really be useless. Alot of these pioneers in mission
making are not on board anymore anyways - why downgrading
their partially 'milestones' in mission editing?
If you yourself have the chance to compare a '9' from 2002
to a '7' from nowadays, you have even the chance to see how
mission editing proceeded from then to now.
:edit - oh and btw - it's OFPEC and not OPEC
OPEC is the Organisation of Petrol Exporting Countries and is in
no way related to mission reviewing - at least this is what media told.
~S~ CD