Home   Help Search Login Register  

Author Topic: City of Dead  (Read 5747 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

asmodeus

  • Guest
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #30 on: 10 Aug 2003, 06:55:30 »
YOu aren't supposed to clear the city!!

That is an optional objective!  lol  

You can just go into the city, destroy the computers, and get out!   :P

Asmo

Offline .pablo.

  • Former Staff
  • ****
  • When in doubt, empty the magazine.
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #31 on: 11 Aug 2003, 01:07:43 »
you still have to fight the people in the city to get to the computer, so basically you do have to clear a part of the city to get to the computer without getting shot in the back.

Offline Messiah

  • Honourary OFPEC Patron & Drinking Buddy of Wolfsbane
  • Honoured Contributor
  • ***
  • OFPEC Veteran
    • Project UK Forces
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #32 on: 11 Aug 2003, 01:14:49 »
welcome to ofp?
Proud Member of the Volunteer Commando Battalion

Offline .pablo.

  • Former Staff
  • ****
  • When in doubt, empty the magazine.
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #33 on: 11 Aug 2003, 04:00:17 »
no, welcome to an unrealistic and annoying mission

Captain Winters

  • Guest
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #34 on: 11 Aug 2003, 04:54:04 »
okay, lets calm it down people.

pablo its coo u tink dat but ken you keep comments liek that to urself?
hell man i did all the time a couple years ago  ::) O.O
thanks buddy

not every mission u play is gona be realitic :)

Tanks!  8)
« Last Edit: 11 Aug 2003, 04:57:10 by Captain Winters »

Offline Noon416

  • Old Bugger
  • Former Staff
  • ****
Re:City of Dead
« Reply #35 on: 11 Aug 2003, 07:07:56 »
Indeed, Captain Winters.

.pablo.
If you dislike the mission that much on the grounds of realism, don't play it. Simple and effective.
No one's forcing you to play it, and if you continue to do so, its through your own volition.

OFPEC always appreciates *constructive* feedback on how to improve itself in any area. Hence, why we've let this thread run so long, given that it's helping improve the review process.

But it seems this thread has definitely run its course and is now just turning into flamebait, as evidenced by the last few posts.

*Locked*
"If a man talks in the woods and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?"